Find out which content earns its place, and why.
Content Intelligence joins page-level analytics with landing-page scorecards and text analysis, so a page’s results and its likely causes sit together.
Content Intelligence Canvas
- Observed change
- Mentions
- Links to
- Supporting evidence
- Targets keyword
- Surfaces opportunity
| Entity | Type | Related to | Relationship |
|---|---|---|---|
| /blog/attribution-guide | Page | Scarcity claim, no deadline | Observed change |
| /blog/attribution-guide | Page | Entity: competitor named | Mentions |
| /blog/attribution-guide | Page | Inbound link: industry roundup | Links to |
| /blog/attribution-guide | Page | Comment cluster (3 similar) | Supporting evidence |
| /blog/attribution-guide | Page | Scroll depth 38% | Observed change |
| /blog/attribution-guide | Page | Keyword: "attribution models" | Targets keyword |
| Scarcity claim, no deadline | Narrative | Opportunity: fix the claim | Surfaces opportunity |
| Page | Sessions | Conv. rate | Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|
| /pricing | 2,140 | 3.1% | 82 |
| /features | 1,760 | 1.8% | 64 |
| /blog/attribution-guide | 1,240 | 0.6% | 58 |
Scope, stated plainly. This combines page analytics, scorecards and text analysis. It does not generate content or predict how new content will perform.
Content reports say what happened, not what to change.
Page views alone reward what is popular, not what converts. Writers and marketers need results and reasons in one place.
Persuasion claims are also risky when they are unverifiable: a scarcity message without a real deadline erodes trust.
Popularity is not performance
Traffic without conversion context misdirects effort.
Causes are separate from results
A scorecard in one tool and analytics in another rarely meet.
Claims go unchecked
Persuasion patterns are hard to audit by eye at scale.
From page results to the likely reasons.
Track pages
Sessions and conversions are attributed to each page.
Score landing pages
A scorecard checks conversion basics and lists findings.
Analyse text
Persuasion signals are detected, each with an evidence excerpt.
Review sources
Link intelligence classifies where content is referenced and by whom.
Signals it reads
- Sessions and conversions per page
- Entry and exit patterns
- Landing-page CRO findings
- Page type and structure
- Persuasion and sentiment signals
- Source and entity classification
Intelligence you can act on, with the evidence attached.
Intelligence produced
- Per-page performance next to a scorecard
- Findings with severity and recommended fixes
- Persuasion signals with quoted evidence
- A source and entity view for linked content
Recommended actions
- Rewrite the lowest-scoring high-traffic page first
- Remove or substantiate an unverified urgency claim
- Re-score after the change and compare
- Log the change as an action to measure its impact
What changes for the team.
Effort follows evidence
Edits go to pages with both traffic and weak scores.
Safer messaging
Unsupported persuasion claims are caught before publication.
Repeatable reviews
The same scorecard runs each time, so results are comparable.
Content tied to outcomes
Conversions sit next to every page.
Who reaches for it, and why.
Content and editorial teams
Decide what to update, merge or retire.
CRO specialists
Prioritise landing pages by score and traffic.
Compliance-minded teams
Audit persuasion language for unsupported claims.
Related capabilities, tools and reading.
Questions people ask first.
Does it write or rewrite content?
No. It reports results, scores and signals so you can decide what to change.
What is a persuasion signal?
A detected pattern such as scarcity or social proof, shown with the text it came from.
Can I compare pages?
Yes. Page performance and scorecards can be reviewed side by side.
See what is moving your numbers.
Install one tracking snippet and start reading your own data. Or ask for a walkthrough first.