Skip to content
Intelligence · Performance Benchmarks

Benchmark against something you can inspect: a rubric, and your own history.

Scores are computed from defined checks, so a change in score always traces to a change in a check. Re-run them over time to see real movement.

Performance DeltaSample data
Tracking88+4 pt vs. last period
SEO64+3 pt vs. last period
Conversion52-6 pt vs. last period
Email deliverability91+2 pt vs. last period
Bars show your current score; the marker is your own target. Scores use a published rubric, so a change always traces to a change in a check.

Scope, stated plainly. The platform does not ship industry benchmark datasets or peer comparisons. Scores compare you with a published rubric and with your own past results, which is where change is attributable.

The problem

Peer averages flatter or discourage without explaining anything.

“Above the industry average” says little about what to do next, and the sample behind an average is rarely visible.

Your own trend, measured the same way each time, is a more reliable benchmark.

  • Opaque comparisons

    Averages hide who is in the sample and how it was measured.

  • Scores that cannot be explained

    A number is only useful with the checks behind it.

  • No like-for-like history

    Without repeatable scoring, progress is anecdotal.

How it works

From a first score to a trend.

  1. Run a scored audit

    Marketing health, landing page, email deliverability and tracking health each have a rubric.

  2. Review the checks

    Each score lists what passed, warned or failed.

  3. Fix and re-run

    Recalculate on a schedule or on demand.

  4. Compare against your history

    See which categories moved and why.

Signals it reads

Health
  • Marketing health categories
  • Growth score components
Deliverability
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC checks
  • DNSSEC and CAA records
Tracking
  • Tag and event detection
  • Business-event coverage
What you get

Intelligence you can act on, with the evidence attached.

Intelligence produced

  • Scores with per-check detail
  • Category trends over time
  • Findings ranked by impact
  • Shareable results for stakeholders

Recommended actions

  • Target the lowest category with the biggest weight
  • Re-run after each fix
  • Set a target score per quarter
  • Share results with the people who own the fixes
Business impact

What changes for the team.

  1. Explainable progress

    Each point of movement maps to a specific check.

  2. Honest targets

    Goals are set against a rubric, not an unexplained average.

  3. Quicker triage

    The weakest category is obvious.

  4. Consistent reporting

    The same rubric each month keeps reports comparable.

Use cases

Who reaches for it, and why.

  • Marketing leads

    Report a stable set of scores to leadership.

  • Agencies

    Show before-and-after scores for each engagement.

  • Operations

    Track email deliverability and tracking health as hygiene.

FAQ

Questions people ask first.

Do you publish industry benchmark data?

Not at this time. We compare you with a published rubric and with your own past results.

Can I trust the score?

Every score lists its checks, so you can verify why it is what it is.

How often can I re-run it?

On demand, and some modules recalculate on a schedule.

See what is moving your numbers.

Install one tracking snippet and start reading your own data. Or ask for a walkthrough first.